<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Excel Fails Math Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lirent.net/microsoft/microsoft-excel-fails-math-test.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lirent.net/microsoft/microsoft-excel-fails-math-test.html</link>
	<description>News, Reviews, Resouces and Hacks!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Excel Fails Math Test</title>
		<link>http://lirent.net/microsoft/microsoft-excel-fails-math-test.html#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Excel Fails Math Test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirent.net/microsoft/microsoft-excel-fails-math-test.html#comment-52</guid>
		<description>[...] ReniX wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIn a blog post, Microsoft employee David Gainer said that when computer users tried to get Excel 2007 to multiply some pairs of numbers and the result was 65535, Excel would incorrectly display 100000 as the answer. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ReniX wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptIn a blog post, Microsoft employee David Gainer said that when computer users tried to get Excel 2007 to multiply some pairs of numbers and the result was 65535, Excel would incorrectly display 100000 as the answer. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
